Home / News & Analysis / E Ink Creates 10.2-Inch Folding E-Reader

E Ink Creates 10.2-Inch Folding E-Reader

For most people, the only E Ink display they've ever interacted with is the 6-inch panel used in e-readers such as the Amazon Kindle range. That seems set to continue, but in the near future we may see a much larger e-paper display offered thanks to the creation of folding e-paper.

At SID Display Week in Los Angeles, E Ink had a booth showing off a range of new products. But the one that caught our eye is a new, folding E Ink display that allows for a book-form e-reader.

As ARMdevices.net reports, the folding prototype display is made of plastic and uses a 10.2-inch Carta Mobius panel offering 220 pixels-per-inch density. It doesn't give up any of the features commonly associated with e-paper, so it still only uses power when the information on the display is changed and text looks great.

While a folding E Ink display is highly desirable, this prototype includes two features that work against it in terms of ever becoming a viable product. The first is the fact the panel has a glossy finish. One of the key benefits of e-paper is the ability to view it in all lighting conditions, even bright sunlight. A glossy finish suggests that isn't the case here.

The second negative against this display is the limited fold. As you can see in the video above, although the panel can be folded shut like a book, the hinge area is rather thick. That's because the panel is limited by the bending radius meaning it can't be folded completely flat.

Related

If E Ink can improve the bend radius so the panel really can close right up like a book, and remove the glossy finish, then I can see a new Kindle on the horizon that truly is just like a real book. Until then, I can't see this prototype being turned into a mass-produced commercial product.

If you keep watching the video you'll also see an E Ink dress, a 42-inch panel for digital signage, a credit card, an interactive whiteboard, and Plastic Logic offering a range of flexible and touchscreen displays using E Ink tech for devices including tablets, smartphones, and smartwatches. Color e-paper is also still being pushed forward by Plastic Logic, with E Ink having unveiled a full color panel last year.

Read more

Check Also

Google keeps a history of your locations even when Location History is off

In a wonderfully clear example of “dark patterns” designed to mislead users and retain control over their data, Google continues tracking your location even when you turn off Location History and are told that “the places you go are no longer stored.” Google says it tells users, but its disclosure is the bare minimum and users are discouraged from further interference with data collection. A report from the AP lays out the details, but the information will come as no surprise to anyone who has tried to fully expunge their location data, or who read the “dark patterns” report from June. The problem is quite simple. When you turn off (technically “pause,” a choice of words in itself troubling) “Location History,” a major Google account-level setting, you are told: “With Location History off, the places you go are no longer stored.” Yet many apps and services Google provides when Location History has been turned off, in fact, do record and store your location. To be fair, this is explained, after a fashion, when you turn off location history (here): “This setting does not affect other location services on your device, like Google Location Services and Find My Device. Some location data may be saved as part of your activity on other Google services, like Search and Maps.” Although it makes sense that checking the weather would require location data, it makes less sense that the data would be collected systematically, in direct contradiction with what the user has been told. It’s not exactly a deception on Google’s part, but rather what appears to be a deliberate understatement of the company’s other location tracking practices. Not listed: that a precise location is recorded every time you interact with some apps and services. That “some location data” as part of your search history is precise and organized, good enough to reconstitute a person’s movements over a few days, as indeed the AP reporters did; with Location History off, there was in fact a detailed history of locations stored with Google. Google protests that you can turn off this location data collection as well — it’s just under a separate setting called “Web and App Activity.” Why is it there? Why are there multiple places? Why is the user not told that in order to truly turn off location history, there is a second setting that must be adjusted as well? Why is it assumed that the user will understand that location is also stored under separate headings of search and other services? It hardly need be said that this is completely inadequate as far as informing the user of how their data is being handled. WTF is dark pattern design? Further, it falls squarely under the concept of dark patterns. The user is duped into thinking that their locations are no longer being recorded by Google, down to a warning from the company that some services might not work correctly if Location History is disabled. Meanwhile location is still recorded silently and without notifying the user, for example, that such and such an action will produce a location record that will be saved, and giving them a chance to delete it or recall the action. The deletion of these points, by the way, is one of Google’s other defenses: you can go delete them at any time. But deleting location history points was one of the main points of criticism for Google in the dark patterns paper, which found that hardly any of their testers could figure out how to do it. There are separate controls for different types of location collection, isolated from each other and each unaffected by the other’s deletion or restriction, but it is not explained why, or why for example some can be deleted in bulk but others must be done one by one. This kind of confusing and underhanded, not to say malicious, practice is far from uncommon among tech companies, but this is a particularly indefensible one. Continuing to maintain a history of locations when a user has deliberately indicated their preference to have no such history recorded is simply ridiculous. In a statement to TechCrunch, Google explained: Location History is a Google product that is entirely opt in, and users have the controls to edit, delete, or turn it off at any time. As the story notes, we make sure Location History users know that when they disable the product, we continue to use location to improve the Google experience when they do things like perform a Google search or use Google for driving directions. It’s easy to imagine a handful of minor UI or alert changes that would fully inform users of what is being recorded and when. A notification when a location is generated, for instance, or a link to the separate location tracking setting would be sufficient. But it is telling that not only is the interface the way it is, but the system has been designed the way it is: silently recording location in spite of user preference, with no way to opt out without compromising the service. These are both deliberate choices and the more such choices are exposed and questioned, the better off users will be.

3 comments

  1. LIKE WᎻAᎢ DADDY, TELL US, TEᏞL US.? Both boys jumped up and down wanting to know tһe waay
    to mаke God haρpy.

  2. I am really impressed with your writing skills as well as with the layout
    on your weblog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself?

    Anyway keep up the excellent quality writing, it’s rare
    to see a nice blog like this one today.

    • the-online-tech

      First of all, thank you for the great feedback
      Yes, this is a paid theme, but I customized it my self.
      You can find some good themes in themeforest.net
      Or you can begin for free with some good free themes 🙂
      Google and Youtube are your best friends 🙂

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Disclaimer: Trading in bitcoins or other digital currencies carries a high level of risk and can result in the total loss of the invested capital. theonlinetech.org does not provide investment advice, but only reflects its own opinion. Please ensure that if you trade or invest in bitcoins or other digital currencies (for example, investing in cloud mining services) you fully understand the risks involved! Please also note that some external links are affiliate links.