Home / News & Analysis / Humans Are Still Better Drivers Than Machines—for Now

Humans Are Still Better Drivers Than Machines—for Now

According to Ford and others, fully autonomous robo-taxis could be deployed on public streets by the start of the next decade. And while self-driving technology is progressing at a much faster pace than ever imagined, humans are still better drivers in certain instances. Autonomous cars have some catching up to do.

Nextcar Bug artThe sensors used in self-driving cars—radar, Lidar, cameras—and the accompanying software still can't outperform similar information-gathering and processing aspects of the human brain. That's the premise of a recent whitepaper by Brandon Schoettle, a project manager at the University of Michigan's Transportation Research Institute.

"Machines/computers are generally well suited to perform tasks like driving, especially in regard to reaction time (speed), power output and control, consistency, and multichannel information processing," Schoettle writes. But he adds that, "Human drivers still generally maintain an advantage in terms of reasoning, perception, and sensing when driving."

A person, for example, may be able to perceive the difference between a gray sky and the trailer of a semi that's roughly the same color. But a self-driving car cannot, as demonstrated in the deadly Tesla Model S crash.

There are countless other limitations for self-driving sensors and software. Humans can stay in their lane even if road markings are faded or completely gone. They can also quickly and easily tell whether a person crossing the street ahead is staring at a phone instead of paying attention to the car heading towards them.

Velodyne LiDAR

While machine learning will eventually be able to decipher hand gestures that human drivers use to communicate, such as a wave-through at a four-way stop, decoding subtle but critical eye contact that's common between drivers and pedestrians may take longer. Researchers at the University of Washington recently showed how self-driving cars can even be fooled by slight modifications to traffic signs, whereas a human can instantly recognize, say, a stop sign or even the speed limit at a glance. Whether they obey is another matter.

Driving Like a Bat at Night

But as good as (some) humans are at driving, machines have distinct advantages.

"While no single sensor completely equals human-sensing capabilities, some offer capabilities not possible for a human driver," according to Schoettle, who points to radar sensors that can "see" much better than humans at night.

Related

According to the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, the chance of a fatal crash is four times higher at night. The human eye can see about 250 feet at night, and headlights can only illuminate the area about 350 feet ahead of a vehicle. Like the bats that inspired the technology, radar sensors detect objects up to 820 feet ahead, even in low or no light. Lidar sensors have a similar depth of field, and can detect objects 360 degrees around a vehicle.

Combining these capabilities via sensor fusion and software will eventually make self-driving technology superior to humans. But for now, "you're probably safer in a self-driving car than with a 16-year-old, or a 90-year-old. But you're probably significantly safer with an alert, experienced, middle-aged driver than in a self-driving car," Schoettle tells Wired.

Sensors and software doesn't get distracted, tired, drunk, or stoned, and can see better at night and in low-light conditions. So I'd bet that with self-driving technology improving by leaps and bounds, autonomous vehicles will quickly surpass human capability. Maybe even in the next decade.

Read more

Check Also

Twitter is holding off on fixing verification policy to focus on election integrity

Twitter is pausing its work on overhauling its verification process, which provides a blue checkmark to public figures, in favor of election integrity, Twitter product lead Kayvon Beykpour tweeted today. That’s because, as we approach another election season, “updating our verification program isn’t a top priority for us right now (election integrity is),” he wrote on Twitter this afternoon. Last November, Twitter paused its account verifications as it tried to figure out a way to address confusion around what it means to be verified. That decision came shortly after people criticized Twitter for having verified the account of Jason Keller, the person who organized the deadly white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Virginia. Fast forward to today, and Twitter still verifies accounts “ad hoc when we think it serves the public conversation & is in line with our policy,” Beykpour wrote. “But this has led to frustration b/c our process remains opaque & inconsistent with our intented [sic] pause.” While Twitter recognizes its job isn’t done, the company is not prioritizing the work at this time — at least for the next few weeks, he said. In an email addressed to Twitter’s health leadership team last week, Beykpour said his team simply doesn’t have the bandwidth to focus on verification “without coming at the cost of other priorities and distracting the team.” The highest priority, Beykpour said, is election integrity. Specifically, Twitter’s team will be looking at the product “with a specific lens towards the upcoming elections and some of the ‘election integrity’ workstreams we’ve discussed.” Once that’s done “after ~4 weeks,” he said, the product team will be in a better place to address verification. We've heard some questions recently about the status of Verification on Twitter, so wanted to address directly. Updating our verification program isn’t a top priority for us right now (election integrity is). Here’s some history & context, and how we plan to put it on our roadmap — Kayvon Beykpour (@kayvz) July 17, 2018

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Disclaimer: Trading in bitcoins or other digital currencies carries a high level of risk and can result in the total loss of the invested capital. theonlinetech.org does not provide investment advice, but only reflects its own opinion. Please ensure that if you trade or invest in bitcoins or other digital currencies (for example, investing in cloud mining services) you fully understand the risks involved! Please also note that some external links are affiliate links.