Home / News & Analysis / 6 US Cities Amazon Should Consider for its Second Headquarters

6 US Cities Amazon Should Consider for its Second Headquarters

Amazon has gotten too big for Seattle. Now it's looking to build a second headquarters somewhere in the US, and it's taking suggestions.

This morning, Amazon started soliciting offers from metropolitan areas to host a new campus for up to 50,000 employees. This "HQ2" would become a co-equal headquarters to Amazon's giant Seattle setup, the company says. The headquarters must be no more than 30 miles from a major population center and no more than 45 minutes from an international airport.

The prize here will be big, with tens of thousands of jobs and over $5 billion in investment. Expect cities and states to start falling all over each other with tax incentives and land deals. Bids are due by Oct. 19, and Amazon will make its decision next year.

Amazon has demands. Here's what it wants:

  • Metropolitan areas with more than 1 million people
  • A stable and business-friendly environment
  • Urban or suburban locations with the potential to attract and retain strong technical talent
  • Communities that think big and creatively when considering locations and real estate options

I think Amazon probably wants to get away from the West Coast, which would count out options like San Diego, Boise, Phoenix, and Denver. The expensive, crowded main metro areas of the Northeast Corridor also seem to me to be unlikely winners, because Amazon can get much more for its money elsewhere.

These are my top six suggestions, in order, of where Amazon might land:

1. Kansas City

Kansas City

Possibly the nation's most underrated tech hub, Kansas City was one of the first Google Fiber markets and is home to Sprint. The city has terrific internet connectivity, it has been nurturing tech startups in the Crossroads neighborhood, land is affordable, the airport has nonstop flights to all the right places, and the local government has a very pro-tech stance. Kansas City's primary downside is its lack of international flights. "Kansas City International Airport" holds its title because of flights to Toronto and Cancun, which isn't the globe-spanning range Amazon wants.

2. Dallas-Fort Worth

Dallas

The Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex is the fourth-largest metro area in the US, with more than 6 million people. It has its own tech titan in Samsung, and it's just down the road from Austin, a vibrant tech hub. It's centrally located and has one of the nation's major airports.

The Fort Worth side of the Metroplex is going through some major changes right now, with the city redeveloping downtown with a riverwalk, lakes, canals, and apartment buildings—turning the former city of stockyards into a real urban center. There's a major new entertainment district planned for 2024, and frequent commuter rail connects the city to central Dallas.

Dallas is a bit more expensive, and a bit further along in terms of development. It's positively buzzing as an urban hub, with world-class dining and nightlife, a growing public transit system, and a diverse population. That would be an easy move for Amazon.

3. Minneapolis

Minneapolis

Minneapolis has long been a center for health tech, with the Mayo Clinic nearby. It's also the home of two of Amazon's major competitors, Target and Best Buy. Within the past year, according to the Star-Tribune, it's become a startup center as well, with startup accelerators settling in the Twin Cities. Minneapolis has a vibrant downtown and a real international airport with flights to Europe and Asia.

The city has a few down sides. Winter weather is famously awful. Amazon may not want to be too close to its major competitors. And Minnesota's employment market is so strong that Amazon would probably have to import employees from the rest of the US, rather than tapping into an existing local worker pool.

4. Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh is on the verge of being cool again. The city has two powerhouse universities, one of which—Carnegie Mellon—specializes in technology, with great potential synergies for Amazon. There's a vibrant nightlife (thanks to those universities), housing is affordable, and Amazon could say that it's revitalizing the Rust Belt. Pittsburgh is also a drivable distance from Amazon's Cincinnati cargo hub.

Pittsburgh's down side is that it isn't a transit hub. Its airport has shrunk from its glory days, and there isn't even a nonstop flight to Seattle. Its "international" flights are to Toronto, Cancun, Frankfurt, and Reykjavik. Amazon may want better connectivity.

5. Cincinnati

Cincinnati

Mobile Nations' Derek Kessler suggests Cinci because Amazon already has a major investment there: a $1.5 billion dollar cargo hub. Cinci is certainly affordable, with a historic downtown that's been in the midst of redevelopment.

Cincinnati's greatest weakness is that it's terminally uncool. The city lacks high-profile universities or a nationally known arts, entertainment, or technology scene. Its reputation for being a quiet, relaxing place to raise a family is a minus when competing with places like San Francisco for young techies. The city also has awful public transportation, and Amazon likes public transit.

6. Charlotte

Charlotte

Probably the best East Coast pick, Charlotte is a finance and financial-technology center with affordable land, an educated workforce, and a great airport.

Charlotte's down side is that, like Cincinnati, it really lacks urban cachet for a company that prides itself on its urban experiments. The North Carolina state government has also been at loggerheads with Amazon over development of a wind farm and the state's previous anti-gay HB2 law, and Jeff Bezos may just not want to do a deal there.

Read more

Check Also

Eric Schmidt says Elon Musk is ‘exactly wrong’ about AI

When former Google CEO Eric Schmidt was asked about Elon Musk’s warnings about AI, he had a succinct answer: “I think Elon is exactly wrong.” “He doesn’t understand the benefits that this technology will provide to making every human being smarter,” Schmidt said. “The fact of the matter is that AI and machine learning are so fundamentally good for humanity.” He acknowledged that there are risks around how the technology might be misused, but he said they’re outweighed by the benefits: “The example I would offer is, would you not invent the telephone because of the possible misuse of the telephone by evil people? No, you would build the telephone and you would try to find a way to police the misuse of the telephone.” Schmidt, who has pushed back in the past against AI naysaying from Musk and scientist Stephen Hawking, was interviewed on-stage today at the VivaTech conference in Paris. While he stepped down as executive chairman of Google’s parent company Alphabet in December, Schmidt remains involved as a technical advisor, and he said today that his work is now focused on new applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence. Elon Musk speaks onstage at Elon Musk Answers Your Questions! during SXSW at ACL Live on March 11, 2018 in Austin, Texas. (Photo by Chris Saucedo/Getty Images for SXSW) After wryly observing that he had just given the journalists in the audience their headlines, interviewer (and former Publicis CEO) Maurice Lévy asked how AI and public policy can be developed so that some groups aren’t “left behind.” Schmidt’s replied government should fund research and education around these technologies. “As [these new solutions] emerge, they will benefit all of us, and I mean the people who think they’re in trouble, too,” he said. He added that data shows “workers who work in jobs where the job gets more complicated get higher wages — if they can be helped to do it.” Schmidt also argued that contrary to concerns that automation and technology will eliminate jobs, “The embracement of AI is net positive for jobs.” In fact, he said there will be “too many jobs” — because as society ages, there won’t be enough people working and paying taxes to fund crucial services. So AI is “the best way to make them more productive, to make them smarter, more scalable, quicker and so forth.” While AI and machine learning were the official topics of the interview, Levy also asked how Google is adapting to Europe’s GDPR regulations around data and privacy, which take effect today. “From our perspective, GDPR is the law of the land and we have complied with it,” Schmidt said. Speaking more generally, he suggested that governments need to “find the balance” between regulation and innovation, because “the regulations tend to benefit the current incumbents.” What about the argument that users should get some monetary benefit when companies like Google build enormous businesses that rely on users’ personal data? “I’m perfectly happy to redistribute the money — that’s what taxes are for, that’s what regulation is for,” Schmidt said. But he argued that consumers are already benefiting from these business models because they’re getting access to free services. “The real value is not the data but in the industrial construction of the firm which uses the data to solve a problem to make money,” he said. “That’s capitalism.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Disclaimer: Trading in bitcoins or other digital currencies carries a high level of risk and can result in the total loss of the invested capital. theonlinetech.org does not provide investment advice, but only reflects its own opinion. Please ensure that if you trade or invest in bitcoins or other digital currencies (for example, investing in cloud mining services) you fully understand the risks involved! Please also note that some external links are affiliate links.