Home / News & Analysis / Can the Senate Get it Together to Pass Self-Driving Car Regs?

Can the Senate Get it Together to Pass Self-Driving Car Regs?

Self-driving car technology is moving faster than anyone ever imagined. Automakers such as Ford and Nissan and tech companies such as Google are eyeing publicly available, fully autonomous vehicles by 2020.

Nextcar Bug artOf course, government moves at a slower pace, and changes to long-established regulations—particularly when it comes to cars and their economic impact and safety implications—can take years to wind through the various branches of government, especially at the federal level. And with the unprecedented partisan divisions in D.C., federal laws overseeing autonomous vehicle technology could be in for an uphill climb.

But in a rare display of bipartisanship on Capitol Hill this week, the House passed the SELF-DRIVE Act after it was unanimously approved by the House Energy and Commerce Committee ahead of the August recess. The bill's biggest impact is that it calls for implementing regulation of self-driving cars at the federal level, negating a patchwork of state laws that have been enacted in recent years.

Another important component of the bill is that developers of self-driving technology would get exemptions from federal safety standards that normally cover motor vehicles, such as, say, requiring a steering wheel and pedals. The bill would also allow developers of the technology to deploy up to 100,000 self-driving vehicles a year, although the number will be limited to 25,000 in the first year.

The bill now goes to the Senate, where it may not be on the same fast track, as the chamber faces an unusually heavy legislative workload.

Competing Regulations in Play

Complicating matters, the Senate and the Trump administration have their own approaches on how to regulate self-driving cars.

In June, Senators Gary Peters (D-MI), John Thune (R-SD), and Bill Nelson (D-FL) outlined their own self-driving car legislation. They plan to hold a hearing in the Senate Commerce Committee on Sept. 13 to decide whether self-driving vehicle legislation should also include autonomous trucks.

The Trump administration is expected to issue its own policy on self-driving cars as soon as next week. Reuters reports that Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao plans to unveil guidelines for autonomous vehicles as an update to the voluntary safety checklist issued under former President Barack Obama in 2016.

But President Trump has not nominated a director for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the arm of the USDOT tasked with implementing self-driving car regulations. In addition, a panel of self-driving experts advising the US government on the technology dispersed without ever holding a meeting, according to Recode.

Related

While developers of self-driving technology have praised the House bill, some are skeptical. Consumer Reports' policy arm, Consumers Union, says lawmakers should require stronger safety regulations on autonomous vehicles, while labor unions are concerned about the impact the technology will have on jobs, especially in industries like trucking.

Overseas, Germany and China have moved autonomous vehicle regulation into the fast lane to help their countries' homegrown industries. When the group of US senators announced their legislation in June, Sen. Peters noted that it "will help the federal government promote the safe development and adoption of self-driving vehicles and ensure the United States remains the world leader in transportation innovation."

But if the three branches of federal government don't hurry to get aligned on autonomous vehicle regulation, the US could be left behind.

Read more

Check Also

Trump reportedly pushed USPS to double Amazon’s shipping rates

According to new reporting from The Washington Post, President Trump personally pushed United States Postal Service head Megan Brennan to jack up shipping prices on Amazon and other firms. The story comes from unnamed sources, who suggest that, thus far, the postmaster general has held out against pressure from the president. If enacted, the new pricing structure would likely cost the online retailer and others billions. Amazon has been in Trump’s crosshairs from some time, of course. In late March, he took to Twitter to personally call out a “scam” he believed was costing the USPS “billions,” writing, “If the P.O. ‘increased its parcel rates, Amazon’s shipping costs would rise by $2.6 Billion.’ This Post Office scam must stop. Amazon must pay real costs (and taxes) now!” Brennan has reportedly pushed back on the notion that deals with companies like Amazon have been a bad deal for the postal service, offering evidence of the upsides of such partnerships in meetings with the president. She has also noted that such multiyear contracts wouldn’t be easy to break. But Trump’s criticism of Amazon clearly has a personal element. Here’s a nice compendium of the many times he’s gone after the company and its owner Jeff Bezos on Twitter — at least through late-March. The criticism really started to hit its stride around 2015. Bezos, of course, also own The Washington Post, a paper Trump has regularly called out for reporting “fake news.” Further clouding all of this is the fact that the USPS hasn’t released the specifics of its pricing deals with Amazon, for fear of given competing delivery services “an unfair advantage.” It has, however, insisted that it’s made money on its deals with Amazon, in spite of the fact that the service reported a $2.7 billion loss in 2017.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Disclaimer: Trading in bitcoins or other digital currencies carries a high level of risk and can result in the total loss of the invested capital. theonlinetech.org does not provide investment advice, but only reflects its own opinion. Please ensure that if you trade or invest in bitcoins or other digital currencies (for example, investing in cloud mining services) you fully understand the risks involved! Please also note that some external links are affiliate links.