Home / Explore Technology / Phones / Apple iPhone 8 Plus

Apple iPhone 8 Plus

MSRP
$799.00

  • Pros

    Dual cameras. Super-fast processor. Wireless charging.

  • Cons

    Not the fastest LTE connections. Still a relatively low-res screen with big bezel for this price category.

  • Bottom Line

    The iPhone 8 Plus may promise better augmented reality experiences than its smaller counterpart thanks to its dual cameras.

The iPhone 8 Plus—really the iPhone 7s Plus, when you think about it—may be the sweet spot in Apple's new phone lineup. Its dual cameras will enable better augmented reality experiences than the iPhone 8, and its bigger screen offers a better spotlight for high-intensity applications powered by the new A11 processor. And, starting at $799, it's significantly less expensive than the iPhone X.

//Compare Similar Products

Compare

Design

From the front, you may have some trouble telling the iPhone 8 Plus apart from the 7 Plus. At 6.24 by 3.07 by 0.3 inches and 7.13 ounces, it's the same size, but heavier. It has a similar 5.5-inch, 1,920-by-1,080 LCD, although it's been enhanced with True Tone, which gives it better white balance in different kinds of lighting. The Touch ID home button sits below the screen, as usual. There's a Lightning jack, but no headphone jack, and the phone is water-resistant.

Flip over the 8 Plus to see the difference from last year's model. The phone now has a glass back, rather than smooth metal. It also supports wireless charging with all the popular Qi-compatible chargers.

The most impressive new feature is on the inside: the A11 Bionic processor. The all-new system-on-chip has six cores in a big-little design, with two high-performance cores and four efficiency cores, as well as a new GPU designed by Apple. An early Geekbench benchmark result for the iPhone X, cited by developer Steve Troughton-Smith, shows a single-core score of 4061 and a multi-core score of 9959, which nukes other smartphones (the Galaxy Note 8 gets 1870 and 6539) and is more in line with the new iPad Pro, which gets 3936 and 9300.

Apple went with the same dual-modem strategy with the iPhone 8 Plus as it did with the 7 Plus. There are two units: one that works on all four US networks, and one that lacks CDMA and works only on AT&T and T-Mobile. We're pretty sure the first one uses a Qualcomm modem, while the second one uses Intel. Both max out, we're told, at 600Mbps, falling short of the gigabit LTE we've seen on competing Samsung and LG phones. The phone lacks T-Mobile's new Band 71 for rural coverage, which so far is only available in the LG V30.

Apple says the iPhone 8 Plus will have roughly the same battery life as the iPhone 7 Plus.

iPhone 8 Plus Back

Made for AR?

Apple is going big on augmented reality in the next few years. That's why we're uncomfortable telling iPhone buyers to purchase a model that lacks dual cameras. While Apple's ARKit can do augmented reality with a single camera, it's clearly limited. Demos we've seen show ARKit only able to map horizontal surfaces like tables and floors, not walls or whole rooms.

The iPhone 8 Plus, like the 7 Plus, has two main cameras, which may provide a better AR experience in the future (though truly advanced AR may require a dot projector like in the iPhone X; we just don't know). The 8 Plus has dual 12-megapixel cameras: a regular one, with f/1.8 aperture, and a 2x telephoto one, with f/2.8. The telephoto lens is not optically stabilized, unlike on the Samsung Galaxy Note 8 and the iPhone X. For now, the dual cameras are mostly about 2x zoom photography and bokeh, for selective-focus portrait mode like on the iPhone 7 Plus.

There's also a 7-megapixel front-facing camera with f/2.2 aperture.

iPhone 8 Plus AR

Conclusions

The iPhone 8 Plus costs $799 for a 64GB version, or $949 for a 256GB model. The iPhone 8 costs $100 less; the iPhone X costs $200 more. This phone really looks like an incremental upgrade to the iPhone 7 Plus, with wireless charging and the new processor being the standout new features.

But here's the thing. We don't know what this new processor is really going to give us. There may be killer augmented reality applications down the pike that will require the A11 processor and dual cameras. Or Apple may be waiting for the iPhone XI (XII?) for those kinds of leaps forward. A purchase of the iPhone 8 Plus takes a little bit on faith, we think.

The iPhone 8 Plus goes on pre-order on September 15, with phones arriving on September 22. We'll have a full review around then.

Sascha Segan By Sascha Segan Lead Analyst, Mobile Twitter Email

PCMag.com's lead mobile analyst, Sascha Segan, has reviewed hundreds of smartphones, tablets and other gadgets in more than 9 years with PCMag. He's the head of our Fastest Mobile Networks project, one of the hosts of the daily PCMag Live Web show and speaks frequently in mass media on cell-phone-related issues. His commentary has appeared on ABC, the BBC, the CBC, CNBC, CNN, Fox News, and in newspapers from San Antonio, Texas to Edmonton, Alberta. Segan is also a multiple award-winning travel writer, having contributed… More »

More Stories by Sascha

See More +

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus. blog comments powered by DisqusRead more

Check Also

Apple rebukes Australia’s “dangerously ambiguous” anti-encryption bill

Apple has strongly criticized Australia’s anti-encryption bill, calling it “dangerously ambiguous” and “alarming to every Australian.” The Australian government’s draft law — known as the Access and Assistance Bill — would compel tech companies operating in the country, like Apple, to provide “assistance” to law enforcement and intelligence agencies in accessing electronic data. The government claims that encrypted communications are “increasingly being used by terrorist groups and organized criminals to avoid detection and disruption,” without citing evidence. But critics say that the bill’s “broad authorities that would undermine cybersecurity and human rights, including the right to privacy” by forcing companies to build backdoors and hand over user data — even when it’s encrypted. Now, Apple is the latest company after Google and Facebook joined civil and digital rights groups — including Amnesty International — to oppose the bill, amid fears that the government will rush through the bill before the end of the year. In a seven-page letter to the Australian parliament, Apple said that it “would be wrong to weaken security for millions of law-abiding customers in order to investigate the very few who pose a threat.” “We appreciate the government’s outreach to Apple and other companies during the drafting of this bill,” the letter read. “While we are pleased that some of the suggestions incorporated improve the legislation, the unfortunate fact is that the draft legislation remains dangerously ambiguous with respect to encryption and security.” “This is no time to weaken encryption,” it read. “Rather than serving the interests of Australian law enforcement, it will just weaken the security and privacy of regular customers while pushing criminals further off the grid.” Apple laid out six focus points — which you can read in full here — each arguing that the bill would violate international agreements, weaken cybersecurity and harm user trust by compelling tech companies to build weaknesses or backdoors in its products. Security experts have for years said that there’s no way to build a “secure backdoor” that gives law enforcement authorities access to data but can’t be exploited by hackers. Although Australian lawmakers have claimed that the bill’s intentions are not to weaken encryption or compel backdoors, Apple’s letter said the “the breadth and vagueness of the bill’s authorities, coupled with ill-defined restrictions” leaves the bill’s meaning open to interpretation. “For instance, the bill could allow the government to order the makers of smart home speakers to install persistent eavesdropping capabilities into a person’s home, require a provider to monitor the health data of its customers for indications of drug use, or require the development of a tool that can unlock a particular user’s device regardless of whether such tool could be used to unlock every other user’s device as well,” the letter said. Apple’s comments are some of the strongest pro-encryption statements it’s given to date. Two years ago, the FBI sued Apple to force the technology giant to build a tool to bypass the encryption in an iPhone used by one fo the the San Bernardino shooters, who killed 14 people in a terrorist attack in December 2015. Apple challenged the FBI’s demand — and chief executive Tim Cook penned an open letter called the move a “dangerous precedent.” The FBI later dropped its case after it paid hackers to access the device’s contents. Australia’s anti-encryption bill is the latest in a string of legislative efforts by governments to seek greater surveillance powers. The U.K. passed its Investigatory Powers Act in 2016, and earlier this year the U.S. reauthorized its foreign surveillance laws with few changes, despite efforts to close warrantless domestic spying loopholes discovered in the wake of the Edward Snowden disclosures. The Five Eyes group of governments — made up of the U.K., U.S., Canada, Australia and New Zealand — further doubled down on its anti-encryption aggression in recent remarks, demanding that tech companies provide access or face legislation that would compel their assistance. ‘Five Eyes’ governments call on tech giants to build encryption backdoors — or else

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Disclaimer: Trading in bitcoins or other digital currencies carries a high level of risk and can result in the total loss of the invested capital. theonlinetech.org does not provide investment advice, but only reflects its own opinion. Please ensure that if you trade or invest in bitcoins or other digital currencies (for example, investing in cloud mining services) you fully understand the risks involved! Please also note that some external links are affiliate links.