Home / News & Analysis / VR Film Series Takes Viewers Inside Pakistan

VR Film Series Takes Viewers Inside Pakistan

Herding wayward goats and hiding behind a camel are not the things you'd associate with the future-tech sound of the words "virtual reality." But as filmmaker Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy found out as she made Look But With Love, such are the rigors of working on a VR film set.

Look But With Love is a series of five VR films that take place in Pakistan: A Story of Women, A Story of Dance, A Story of a Doctor, A Story of Music, and A Story of Water. They're all answers to a question Obaid-Chinoy says she's often asked as she travels: "What is it like to be in Pakistan?"

Though she has formidable experience in film, she struggled with how best to convey the feeling of being in the country. "I'm looking for a medium that is immersive enough, that allows people to literally walk in other people's shoes," she says.

Obaid-Chinoy worked on Look But With Love with fellow director and VR pioneer Chris Milk. As a former journalist and an activist, she's used to documenting reality as vividly as possible. So when she met Milk and Aaron Koblin, co-founders of VR storytelling firm Within, she realized VR could change perspectives, including her own.

Milk and Koblin met when they worked on a project together at Google, where Koblin lead the Data Arts Team. After their collaboration, the two set out to form their own company and create the Within app to serve as a platform for VR that revolves around storytelling.

And a storyteller is how Obaid-Chinoy describes herself. She's made documentaries that have garnered her two Academy Awards as well as seven Emmys (one just this month) and directed and produced Pakistan's first animated film. Despite her formidable background in film, when it came to working in VR, she was a novice and appreciated the expertise of Within.

"The technology isn't as advanced yet as a filmmaker would like," she says. There are limitations in how much movement can be captured when 100 cameras have to be rigged for one shot. She describes spending all day in the desert to film A Story of Water to only get four hours of work from the fast-overheating cameras that could not withstand the searing 120-degree temperature.

Still, Obaid-Chinoy is a tremendous advocate for VR, largely due to its accessibility. As part of the project, she's bringing Google Cardboard into classrooms across Pakistan to expand the worldview of students. It's the same thing she hopes for those who view Look But With Love.

"It places you there, in a country you may not have gone to or may not ever plan to go to but a country that you might empathize with, a people you might empathize with once you watch these films," she says.

When Obaid-Chinoy came up with the name for the piece, she didn't have far to go. "Look, but with love" is a slogan imprinted on the back of many of the painted trucks and rickshaws that traverse Pakistan, and she hopes viewers will "look at Pakistan gently, with love."

A Story of Music

A Story of Women follows the training of some of the women who make up Pakistan's counterterrorism squad. As they rappel down buildings, shoot rocket launchers, and come dangerously close to bombs, they talk about what brought them to choose such work and how it's viewed.

Though A Story of Dance, which features Bina Jawwad passing on cultural dance to children is tonally different from A Story of Women, Jawwad is no less brave than the women commandos. There is a movement to ban teaching dance in schools in Pakistan, and Jawwad is working against that to preserve the country's heritage.

In A Story of a Doctor, it is impossible to not be moved by the scenes in an emergency ward that tends to children who live in a surrounding slum. Anxious parents wait for signs of improvement in their children, in some cases participating in the care themselves, like one mother who hand pumps oxygen into a tiny child mostly obscured by surgical tape and tubes.

Sound fills the next episode, A Story of Music. Musician Saif Samejo was moved to film instruments that are rarely played anymore in Pakistan. He speaks of seeing himself as an activist as well as a musician and he talks to those who are among the last to play traditional instruments and songs.

It's life itself that Ali Akbar tries to save in A Story of Water. Poison plagues the tiny bit of ground water that the people of the desert Thar region have to survive. Akbar creates awareness and solutions for villages that are suffering.


Milk says of VR, "The human connection that you feel with someone that feels immediately present to you, that you feel like you're sitting on the same berth with and that you're breathing the same air with, there's a powerful feeling of connection that happens there."

In a way it's the same sort of connection that Obaid-Chinoy feels with VR itself now that she's spent so much time with it. "To me it's the kind of medium that can change the way we see the world," she says.

To experience Look But With Love, download the Within app.

Read more

Check Also

The new era in mobile

Joe Apprendi Contributor Joe Apprendi is a general partner at Revel Partners. More posts by this contributor Big data’s humble beginnings A future dominated by autonomous vehicles (AVs) is, for many experts, a foregone conclusion. Declarations that the automobile will become the next living room are almost as common — but, they are imprecise. In our inevitable driverless future, the more apt comparison is to the mobile device. As with smartphones, operating systems will go a long way toward determining what autonomous vehicles are and what they could be. For mobile app companies trying to seize on the coming AV opportunity, their future depends on how the OS landscape shapes up. By most measures, the mobile app economy is still growing, yet the time people spend using their apps is actually starting to dip. A recent study reported that overall app session activity grew only 6 percent in 2017, down from the 11 percent growth it reported in 2016. This trend suggests users are reaching a saturation point in terms of how much time they can devote to apps. The AV industry could reverse that. But just how mobile apps will penetrate this market and who will hold the keys in this new era of mobility is still very much in doubt. When it comes to a driverless future, multiple factors are now converging. Over the last few years, while app usage showed signs of stagnation, the push for driverless vehicles has only intensified. More cities are live-testing driverless software than ever, and investments in autonomous vehicle technology and software by tech giants like Google and Uber (measured in the billions) are starting to mature. And, after some reluctance, automakers have now embraced this idea of a driverless future. Expectations from all sides point to a “passenger economy” of mobility-as-a-service, which, by some estimates, may be worth as much as $7 trillion by 2050. For mobile app companies this suggests several interesting questions: Will smart cars, like smartphones before them, be forced to go “exclusive” with a single OS of record (Google, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon/AGL), or will they be able to offer multiple OS/platforms of record based on app maturity or functionality? Or, will automakers simply step in to create their own closed loop operating systems, fragmenting the market completely? Automakers and tech companies clearly recognize the importance of “connected mobility.” Complicating the picture even further is the potential significance of an OS’s ability to support multiple Digital Assistants of Record (independent of the OS), as we see with Google Assistant now working on iOS. Obviously, voice NLP/U will be even more critical for smart car applications as compared to smart speakers and phones. Even in those established arenas the battle for OS dominance is only just beginning. Opening a new front in driverless vehicles could have a fascinating impact. Either way, the implications for mobile app companies are significant. Looking at the driverless landscape today there are several indications as to which direction the OSes in AVs will ultimately go. For example, after some initial inroads developing their own fleet of autonomous vehicles, Google has now focused almost all its efforts on autonomous driving software while striking numerous partnership deals with traditional automakers. Some automakers, however, are moving forward developing their own OSes. Volkswagen, for instance, announced that vw.OS will be introduced in VW brand electric cars from 2020 onward, with an eye toward autonomous driving functions. (VW also plans to launch a fleet of autonomous cars in 2019 to rival Uber.) Tesla, a leader in AV, is building its own unified hardware-software stack. Companies like Udacity, however, are building an “open-source” self-driving car tech. Mobileye and Baidu have a partnership in place to provide software for automobile manufacturers. Clearly, most smartphone apps would benefit from native integration, but there are several categories beyond music, voice and navigation that require significant hardware investment to natively integrate. Will automakers be interested in the Tesla model? If not, how will smart cars and apps (independent of OS/voice assistant) partner up? Given the hardware requirements necessary to enable native app functionality and optimal user experience, how will this force smart car manufacturers to work more seamlessly with platforms like AGL to ensure competitive advantage and differentiation? And, will this commoditize the OS dominance we see in smartphones today? It’s clearly still early days and — at least in the near term — multiple OS solutions will likely be employed until preferred solutions rise to the top. Regardless, automakers and tech companies clearly recognize the importance of “connected mobility.” Connectivity and vehicular mobility will very likely replace traditional auto values like speed, comfort and power. The combination of Wi-Fi hotspot and autonomous vehicles (let alone consumer/business choice of on-demand vehicles) will propel instant conversion/personalization of smart car environments to passenger preferences. And, while questions remain around the how and the who in this new era in mobile, it’s not hard to see the why. Americans already spend an average of 293 hours per year inside a car, and the average commute time has jumped around 20 percent since 1980. In a recent survey (conducted by Ipsos/GenPop) researchers found that in a driverless future people would spend roughly a third of the time communicating with friends and family or for business and online shopping. By 2030, it’s estimated the autonomous cars “will free up a mind-blowing 1.9 trillion minutes for passengers.” Another analysis suggested that even with just 10 percent adoption, driverless cars could account for $250 billion in driver productivity alone. Productivity in this sense extends well beyond personal entertainment and commerce and into the realm of business productivity. Use of integrated display (screen and heads-up) and voice will enable business multi-tasking from video conferencing, search, messaging, scheduling, travel booking, e-commerce and navigation. First-mover advantage goes to the mobile app companies that first bundle into a single compelling package information density, content access and mobility. An app company that can claim 10 to 15 percent of this market will be a significant player. For now, investors are throwing lots of money at possible winners in the autonomous automotive race, who, in turn, are beginning to define the shape of the mobile app landscape in a driverless future. In fact, what we’re seeing now looks a lot like the early days of smartphones with companies like Tesla, for example, applying an Apple -esque strategy for smart car versus smartphone. Will these OS/app marketplaces be dominated by a Tesla — or Google (for that matter) — and command a 30 percent revenue share from apps, or will auto manufacturers with proprietary platforms capitalize on this opportunity? Questions like these — while at the same time wondering just who the winners and losers in AV will be — mean investment and entrepreneurship in the mobile app sector is an extremely lucrative but risky gamble.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Disclaimer: Trading in bitcoins or other digital currencies carries a high level of risk and can result in the total loss of the invested capital. theonlinetech.org does not provide investment advice, but only reflects its own opinion. Please ensure that if you trade or invest in bitcoins or other digital currencies (for example, investing in cloud mining services) you fully understand the risks involved! Please also note that some external links are affiliate links.