Home / News & Analysis / Business Choice Awards 2018: Accounting Software and Services

Business Choice Awards 2018: Accounting Software and Services

Most businesses consider tracking financial health and processing financial transactions to be rather important. For this reason, accounting software and services are indispensable to businesses small and large. Accounting solutions simplify finance so that non-accounting types can easily manage financial operations and comply with legal standards. A formal accounting system avoids costly mistakes due to human error or inconsistency while also improving financial transparency, automating repetitive tasks, and facilitating accurate forecasting around expenses, income, inventory, and staffing.

This edition of PCMag Business Choice Awards focuses on accounting software and services, essential tools for businesses to track, analyze, and report on their financial status. This is an especially important category for our readers as most business leaders feel that staying on top of their financial status is a fairly important component of running a successful business. The Business Choice Awards extend the Readers' Choice Awards by garnering feedback about the hardware, software, and services our readers deploy, administer, maintain, and use in a business environment.

As a devoted Business Choice Awards reader, you already know how this works. Our survey asked respondents to rate their overall satisfaction, reliability, and tech support experience with the accounting software or service they use, plus the likelihood they would recommend it to others.

If you select, deploy, or administer the products in our Business Choice Awards, or if you advise or manage people in these roles, then you know how critical it is to choose the right products. The results of the PCMag Business Choice Awards survey are invaluable when doing so.

You can be part of Business Choice! Sign up for the Readers' Choice Survey mailing list to receive invitations in the future.

Looking for some expert recommendations? Check out the PCMag Business Software Index Accounting & Finance section, and read The Best Small Business Accounting Software.

Accounting Software and Services

As many business owners have discovered, it's accrual world. Kidding aside, accounting software and services are much more than electronic general ledgers. They manage the books plus fixed assets, billing and invoicing, accounts payable and receivable, budgeting and forecasting, payroll, inventory, and more. Make sure to look for the features you know you need and not get sidetracked by bells and whistles. Remember that reporting (historical and forecasting) is a critical feature so make sure you can quickly and easily customize, run, and interpret the reports you need.

In this year's survey, four accounting software and services received enough responses to be included as finalists: Microsoft, Quickbooks, Quicken, and Sage. PeopleSoft from Oracle and SAP, finalists in 2017, didn't receive enough responses, while our core four have remained the same since 2014.

This year's winner of the Business Choice Award for best accounting software or service is Microsoft, which earned top scores in overall satisfaction (7.7), percentage of respondents requiring tech support (15 percent), tech support satisfaction (7.9), and likelihood to recommend (7.4).

BC18- Accounting - Overall

Sage came in a close second with a reliability score of 8.1, yet suffered from a poor showing in the technical support categories.

Readers reported that it's not particularly satisfying to use personal finance software for business accounting. Quicken brings up the rear with the lowest scores in overall satisfaction (7.0), reliability (7.4), tech support satisfaction (4.5), and likelihood to recommend (6.6).

In general, no one is in love with their accounting solution. Year after year, accounting software and services score on the low side. Users view accounting solutions as necessary evils and providers don't seem to be locked in a hotly contested race for innovation.

A very important measure of a software or service is the response to the critical question "How likely are you to recommend your accounting software or service to a colleague?" Microsoft rises to the top with a 7.4 (down from last year's 7.5), Quickbooks scored a 7.2 (down from last year's 7.9), and Sage a 6.9 (down from last year's 7.2), followed by Quicken in the basement at 6.6 (down from last year's 7.4). Scores overall consistent with the prior two years.

This question is used to calculate the Net Promoter Score, which quantifies the differences between accounting software and services. Sage pulled an upset with a 49 percent, a dramatic improvement over last year's 7 percent. Next comes Quickbooks at 39 percent (up from last year's 28 percent), followed by Microsoft at 34 percent (a noteworthy improvement from last year's 8 percent) and Quicken at the bottom with 21 percent (a slight improvement over last year's 15 percent). Everyone is recommending these service just slightly more than last time.

There's a remarkable trend emerging in tech support: Microsoft improves while others decline. At 15 percent (10 percent last year), Microsoft once again had the lowest percentage of respondents requiring tech support with the highest tech support satisfaction score (7.9). Sage had an unfortunate 34 percent of users requiring tech help and a second-place score for tech support satisfaction of 6.5 (a striking decrease from last year's 8.1). For the fourth year in a row, Quicken trails the pack in tech support satisfaction with a 4.5 (even worse than last year's 5.0).

Related StorySee all of our survey results for accounting services.


Business Choice seal

It's clear from the results, PCMag readers think you should stick with the business pro services to have pro-business accounting. And that helped put Microsoft, maker of Dynamics (which handles a lot more than just accounting), their top pick.


We email survey invitations to PCMag.com community members, specifically subscribers to our Readers' Choice Survey mailing list. The surveys are hosted by SurveyMonkey, which also performs our data collection. This survey was in the field from November 27, 2017 to December 18, 2017.

Respondents were asked to rate their accounting services using multiple questions about their overall satisfaction with the solution, as well as experiences with technical support within the past 12 months.

Because the goal of the survey is to understand how the email marketing solutions compare to one another and not how one respondent's experience compares to another's, we use the average of the email marketing solutions' rating, not the average of every respondent's rating. In all cases, the overall ratings are not based on averages of other scores in the table; they are based on answers to the question, "Overall, how satisfied are you with your accounting software or service?"

Scores not represented as a percentage are on a scale of 0 to 10 where 10 is the best.

Net Promoter Scores are based on the concept introduced by Fred Reichheld in his 2006 bestseller, The Ultimate Question, that no other question can better define the loyalty of a company's customers than "how likely is it that you would recommend this company to a friend or colleague?" This measure of brand loyalty is calculated by taking the percent of respondents who answered 9 or 10 (promoters) and subtracting the percent who answered 0 through 6 (detractors).

If you would like to participate in PCMag's monthly Readers' Choice surveys and to be eligible for our monthly sweepstakes promotion, please sign up today.

Read more

Check Also

UK data watchdog still waiting for warrant to raid Cambridge Analytica

The UK’s data watchdog, the Information Commission’s Office (ICO), has still not obtained a warrant to enter and search the servers of the London-based political consultancy, Cambridge Analytica — the company at the center of the data misuse scandal engulfing Facebook — three days on from beginning the process. The earliest a warrant could now be obtained by the regulator is Friday. In a statement today the ICO said: “A High Court judge has adjourned the ICO’s application for a warrant relating to Cambridge Analytica until Friday. The ICO will be in court to continue to pursue the warrant to obtain access to data and information to take forward our investigation.” The information commissioner, Elizabeth Denham, made it public on Tuesday that she was seeking a warrant to search CA’s servers after the company missed a Monday deadline to hand over information her office had requested. She also instructed Facebook to withdraw its own investigators from CA’s offices, warning that their presence could compromise her investigation. Unlike competition authorities, the ICO does not have legal powers to raid offices without a warrant. And former UK attorney general, Dominic Grieve, has argued the ICO’s legal powers are inadequate — telling the BBC on Tuesday that the Facebook-CA scandal highlighted a need for “greater powers and greater sanctions”. Greater sanctions are at least incoming — under the EU’s GDPR regime which will apply from May 25, raising the maximum fine for the most serious data protection violations to up to 4% of a company’s global turnover (or €20M, whichever is greater). But the fact that the data watchdog is forced to sit on its hands waiting to gain access to servers that the companies of interest to its investigation are in control of or able to access raises serious questions about the asymmetry between big data and regulation. Earlier this month Denham told MPs on the DCMS committee that’s investigating fake news that her office would be pushing for increased transparency around data flows and disclosure rules for digital political advertising — suggesting a code of conduct is needed to regulate the use of social media in political campaigns, referendums and elections. And while Facebook has claimed it was unaware that ~50M Facebook users’ data was passed to Cambridge Analytica for political targeting purposes, Facebook has itself long been actively encouraging politicians and political campaigns to make use of its tools — at a time when there was a complete lack of regulation for political ads on digital platforms. Almost a year ago, in May 2017, the ICO announced a formal investigation into the use of data analytics for political purposes — including looking into complaints related to Cambridge Analytica’s use of data for ad targeting. That investigation remains ongoing. And may well now be further delayed, given the developing nature of the story (and the ICO’s push for a warrant so it can conduct a full audit of CA’s servers). Although, earlier this month before the latest Facebook-CA revelations hit the headlines, Denham told the committee she hoped to be able to publish the report by the end of May. Asked by the DCMS committee whether the ICO has adequate powers to carry out its responsibilities Denham flagged a problematic gap in her “information notice powers” — noting that while the ICO can make a formal demand for information, organisations are not compelled to disclose the requested data (though they can be prosecuted for not doing so). “Without the power to compel it is difficult to secure the desired outcome,” she told the committee. But she added she’s raised the issue with ministers and is hopeful the UK government will remedy this gap.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Disclaimer: Trading in bitcoins or other digital currencies carries a high level of risk and can result in the total loss of the invested capital. theonlinetech.org does not provide investment advice, but only reflects its own opinion. Please ensure that if you trade or invest in bitcoins or other digital currencies (for example, investing in cloud mining services) you fully understand the risks involved! Please also note that some external links are affiliate links.