Home / Crypto Currency / Ethereum(ETH) and Ripple(XRP) are ‘Noncompliant Securities,’: Fmr. CFTC Chairman

Ethereum(ETH) and Ripple(XRP) are ‘Noncompliant Securities,’: Fmr. CFTC Chairman



Join our community of 10 000 traders on Hacked.com for just $39 per month.

The two most valuable altcoins are most likely “noncompliant securities” under US law, claims a former markets regulator.

Gary Gensler, a former head of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), said that he believes Ether and XRP have been issued through unregistered securities offerings and are trading illegally on the hundreds of cryptocurrency exchanges that list them. Gensler chaired the CFTC from 2009 to 2014 during the Obama administration and later served as chief financial officer for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. Now, he works as a blockchain researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), where he also serves as a special adviser to the blockchain-friendly Media Lab and a senior lecturer at the Sloan School of Management.

“There is a strong case for both of them — but particularly Ripple — that they are noncompliant securities,” Gensler told the New York Times.

That’s because both cryptocurrencies have been sold by their creators and purchased primarily as investments for speculative reasons. Bitcoin, in contrast, was never issued in this manner and is thus unlikely to be deemed a security by regulators. As CCN reported, Ethereum was bootstrapped in an initial coin offering-style presale in 2014, through which investors purchased Ether units that were distributed once the Ethereum network launched in July 2015. Following that initial distribution, new units of Ether have been distributed through mining, and the Ethereum Foundation now controls less than one percent of the Ether supply. However, top officials at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reportedly recently refused to assure an industry working group backed by venture capital firms Andreessen Horowitz and Union Square Ventures that Ether is not an unregistered security. Nevertheless, Gensler said that because Ethereum has been functional for nearly three years and has achieved a more decentralized development structure, it has a greater chance of evading the “noncompliant securities” label than XRP and most ICOs. XRP was created by San Francisco-based blockchain startup Ripple, and the company issues tokens at its own discretion through sales, grants, and other centralized means. Ripple has repeatedly claimed that XRP is not a security, though cryptocurrency exchange operator and brokerage firm Coinbase has suggested that it does not believe there is regulatory certainty that prevents it from listing the token.

“XRP does not give its owners an interest or stake in Ripple, and they are not paid dividends,” Ripple spokesman Tom Channick told the NYT. “XRP exists independent of Ripple, was created before the company and will exist after it.”

Gensler, meanwhile, said that he believes 2018 will bring a reckoning for the cryptocurrency industry, as regulators continue to take a more active role in policing ICOs and other token sales that allegedly constitute unregistered securities offerings. “2018 is going to be a very interesting time,” Gensler said. “Over 1,000 previously issued initial coin offerings, and over 100 exchanges that offer ICOs, are going to need to sort out how to come into compliance with U.S. securities law.”

Featured image from Shutterstock.

Follow us on Telegram.
Read more

Check Also

iCloud Hacker Demanded $175,000 Ransom to be Paid in Bitcoin

A hacker who filmed himself accessing Apple iCloud accounts has appeared in a U.K. court. Kerem Albayrak had demanded around $175,000 in ransom be paid in Bitcoin and Apple iTunes vouchers for the non-disclosure of sensitive user data. Apple Hacker Charged in Connection with Bitcoin Blackmail An IT analyst from north London has been charged with one count of blackmail and two counts of unauthorised acts intending to hinder access to a computer. Albayrak appeared at Westminster Magistrates’ court where he was granted unconditional bail until his case is heard at Southwark Crown Court on November 14. According to a report in the U.K.’s Daily Mail, Albayrak had recorded himself hacking into iCloud accounts and posted the footage on YouTube. He then contacted Apple and demanded $170,000 to be paid in Bitcoin and iTunes vouchers. He warned the global tech giant that he would disclose the personal details taken from the 319 million users’ accounts he had gained access to if they did not meet his demands. During court proceedings today, it was revealed that Albayrak initially requested around $75,000 before upping his demands to double that figure. He finally settled on $174,000 in Bitcoin and around $1,000 worth of iTunes vouchers. The prosecution’s legal representative, Lorna Vincent, stated: “Mr Karem Albayrak is accused of sending emails to Apple making financial demands for downloading database iCloud accounts and factory resetting those iCloud accounts… He entered into the accounts of the alleged victims and posted a video of his hack onto YouTube.” Albayrak is far from the first to make such ransom demands on big companies. His efforts are reminiscent of last year’s WannaCry ransomware attack. Based on the same principle of blackmailing firms with threats of releasing sensitive data, the malware attack infected hundreds of thousands of computers across the globe. The hacker behind it was able to evade authorities for over a year, but was arrested last month. In a number of decidedly more analogue attacks, people replaced data as the cornerstone upon which to leverage Bitcoin blackmails. In July of this year, a businessman from Cape Town was kidnapped and a demand of 50 BTC was made for his safe return. Liyaqat Parker was returned to his family in September. It is unknown if the ransom was met. Likewise, in Ukraine last December, a crypto-analyst from the EXMO exchange platform was also kidnapped. Once again, those responsible demanded Bitcoin for his safe return. In this example, the demands were met and Pavel Lerner was returned just days later. Fortunately, authorities were able to track Albayrak down before any harm could be done with the data he reportedly managed to access. This is hardly surprising, given how amateurish the young hacker went about coordinating his attack. Featured image from Shutterstock. The post iCloud Hacker Demanded $175,000 Ransom to be Paid in Bitcoin appeared first on NewsBTC.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Disclaimer: Trading in bitcoins or other digital currencies carries a high level of risk and can result in the total loss of the invested capital. theonlinetech.org does not provide investment advice, but only reflects its own opinion. Please ensure that if you trade or invest in bitcoins or other digital currencies (for example, investing in cloud mining services) you fully understand the risks involved! Please also note that some external links are affiliate links.