Home / Crypto Currency / ‘Bitcoin is Stupid’ Author Gets a Lesson in the Value of Being Your Own Bank

‘Bitcoin is Stupid’ Author Gets a Lesson in the Value of Being Your Own Bank


bitcoin cryptocurrency

Advertisement

As anyone who has ever attempted to explain bitcoin to their parents can understand, one of the most challenging parts of convincing them of the utility of this technology is making the case that a person should be his or her own bank. Occasionally, though, an object lesson bites you in the, err, mustache.

The lesson in question comes courtesy of personal finance author Peter Adeney. Writing on Twitter, Adeney, who blogs under the pseudonym Mr. Money Mustache, relayed that Capital One arbitrarily froze his bank account, which was holding several hundred thousand dollars earmarked for a real estate transaction.

Fortunately, Adeney appears to have eventually been able to speak to a bank representative and remedy the situation, assuming his transaction clears following the three-day settlement time. In any case, though, his predicament is perhaps more than a bit ironic.

‘Why Bitcoin is Stupid’

Earlier this year, Adeney penned a bombastic article called, “Why Bitcoin is Stupid,” in which he laid out a vicious takedown of cryptocurrency craze and warned readers of his personal finance blog against investing in the flagship coin.

Credit where credit is due: Though highly critical of bitcoin, Adeney clearly did his homework, and he advised investors against investing in cryptocurrency near the top of the market, likely saving fad-chasing retail investors from making uninformed investment decisions they would live to regret later on.

However, there are several representative arguments worth reconsidering in light of his recent predicament.

Here’s what he has to say about Satoshi Nakamoto’s whitepaper:

“But it also has some ideology built in – the assumption that giving national governments the ability to monitor flows of money in the financial system and use it as a form of law enforcement is wrong…. This financial libertarian streak is at the core of Bitcoin.”

Proposing that cryptocurrency evangelists essentially argue “all the same stuff that people say about Gold, which is also a totally irrational waste of human investment energy,” he said that government-backed currencies represent “human trust and cooperation” and that you “might as well…trust people.”

“Government-issued currencies have value because they represent human trust and cooperation. There is no wealth and no trade without these two things, so you might as well go all-in and trust people. There are no financial instruments that will protect you from a world where we no longer trust each other.”

And here’s one more exceprt:

“So, Bitcoin is a protocol invented to solve a money problem that simply does not exist in the rich countries, which is where most of the money is. Sure, an anonymous way to exchange money and escape the eyes of a corrupt government is a good thing for human rights. But at least 98% of MMM readers do not live in countries where this is an issue.”

Practically speaking, of course, bitcoin in its present form is not an anonymous asset, because, given the tools available to law enforcement, the vast majority of ordinary transactions can be traced back to the individuals behind the pseudonymous addresses.

Spending Money Shouldn’t Require a Bank’s Permission

That’s beside the point though, and in any case, Adeney’s core point appears to be that decentralized, permissionless cryptocurrencies are built on faulty economic ideas, including that there is value in an asset that mimics cash by allowing users to make uncensorable transactions, reduces the necessity of financial intermediaries such as banks, and limits the ability of governments to control the money supply.

As this situation shows, though, financial intermediaries have a broad license — and, in many cases, a government mandate — to freeze customer funds and hold them hostage until the rightful owner can prove that they’re not earmarked for an illicit purpose.

While the injury to Adeney was in this case relatively minor, it could have been much more severe had he required immediate access to the funds.

Similarly, government officers in the U.S. frequently seize assets from citizens whose only “crime” is holding an unusually large amount of cash in their physical possession. To recoup these funds, the guilty-until-proven-innocent individuals must wage a costly legal battle against the government and, in many cases, sign a waiver allowing the government to keep the majority of the cash if they hope to recoup any of the funds at all.

reason civil asset forfeiture
Source: Reason

Moreover, it’s likely that banks will expand their freeze-and-seize policies beyond their government mandate, as there is a growing expectation that businesses including financial institutions should develop a “corporate conscience.”

Institutions such as Citigroup have already begun pressuring business partners involved with firearms sales to restrict purchases beyond what is legally required, while Bank of America has frozen credit to manufacturers of AR-platform rifles. The New York Times even published an op-ed calling for banks to ban customers from using credit cards to purchase AR-15s. As justification for this stance, the author noted that many institutions have already banned customers from using credit cards to buy bitcoin.

In these cases, it’s important to note, the institutions would be preventing clients from borrowing bank-owned money to either fund the production of firearms or purchase those items, but it wouldn’t be a stretch for them to extend such a policy to financial products structured around customer assets, including debit cards and bank accounts.

The point, of course, is not that cryptocurrency, firearms, or whatever other product that captures the disdain of the banks may become moderately more difficult to obtain, it’s that the institutions to which most people entrust the majority of their net worth feel comfortable, beyond what is legally required, telling them how they may spend that money.

These aren’t problems restricted to hypothetical dystopian futures or countries on the brink of economic collapse, and while they might not currently be problems faced by the general population, they can — particularly in the case of civil asset forfeiture — be financially ruinous for the individuals caught in their net.

For all its alleged faults, bitcoin, when held in a non-custodial wallet, allows you to transact freely without your bank’s permission — and it’s much less likely than cash to be arbitrarily seized by the government. That, I contend, is a valuable service.

A Lesson Less Than Learned

But let’s return to Mr. Money Mustache.

Unsurprisingly, Adeney’s plight quickly made its way to Crypto Twitter, and before long his thread was full of comments advising him to use bitcoin the next time he needs to move a large amount of money. The 44-year-old retiree was not amused.

“Why are so many people talking about Bitcoin in this thread as if it’s a valid way to buy a house?” he said, tweeting out another link to his aforementioned bitcoin takedown. “It was priced in US dollars because that the currency of this country!”

Consequently, it seems highly unlikely that we’ll see a pro-bitcoin article gracing the pixels of the Mr. Money Mustache blog anytime soon, but perhaps, in the future, its author may have a bit more respect for the argument that more than just criminals can benefit from uncensorable transactions.

In the meantime, he believes that he has arrived at a solution to his problem: find a new bank.

Disclaimer: The views expressed in the article are solely that of the author and do not represent those of, nor should they be attributed to CCN.

Featured Image from Shutterstock

Follow us on Telegram or subscribe to our newsletter here.
Join CCN's crypto community for $9.99 per month, click here.
Want exclusive analysis and crypto insights from Hacked.com? Click here.
Open Positions at CCN: Full Time and Part Time Journalists Wanted.
Advertisement
Read more

Check Also

ING, Citigroup, Shell And ConsenSys Partner to Create Ethereum-Based Platforms

In spite of a multi-month tumultuous market, institutions continue to clamor for the implementation of innovative systems and solutions that are based on blockchain technologies. 15 Firms Enter A ConsenSys-backed Blockchain Initiative On Wednesday morning, a media embargo on one of the most notable blockchain-related developments of this year was finally dropped. As per a short, but sweet four-page document, entitled “Industry Players and Banks Join Forces to Launch Blockchain Platform to Transform Commodities Trade Finance,” 15 of the “world’s largest institutions,” along with blockchain startup ConsenSys, have joined hands to make a collaborative foray into the enterprise-level blockchain platform space via a new firm called komgo SA. Although many questioned the document’s validity at first, due to a seemingly “dubious website” linked to this venture, Bloomberg, Reuters, and ConsenSys itself have since corroborated this unexpected, yet welcomed development. [email protected] is working with Citi, ING, Shell & more on an #Ethereum #blockchain platform for financing commodities trading. Blockchain is viewed as a solution to trade & settlement inefficiencies and to improving transparency and reducing the risk of fraud https://t.co/sv8KZC7MNX — ConsenSys (@ConsenSys) September 19, 2018 komgo SA, which has already been backed by leading banks, trading companies, and energy firms, intends to digitize the global trade ecosystem via a blockchain-based “open platform.” To facilitate this ambitious move, komgo has been incorporated in Geneva, Switzerland, which has become a leading cryptocurrency and blockchain hub. It is important to note that the 15 firms that have contributed to this startup are: ABN AMRO, BNP Paribas, Citigroup, Crédit Agricole Group, Gunvor, ING, Koch Supply & Trading, Macquarie, Mercuria, MUFG Bank, Natixis, Rabobank, Shell, SGS and Societe Generale, which are all well-respected firms in their own right. Although this lineup of firms is undoubtedly stacked to the brim, as aforementioned, komgo has tapped ConsenSys for its blockchain expertise and its unique insights into leading startups in this industry. Expressing his excitement, Joseph Lubin, a well-known cryptocurrency proponent and the co-founder of Ethereum and ConsenSys, wrote: “We are now entering a new era of simple and inclusive access to blockchain technology to advance stronger, more collaborative, business relationships previously out of reach. We are thrilled to see leading commodity trade finance banks and commodity houses come together to create komgo SA, which will radically simplify and accelerate trustworthiness, auditability, and accessibility to trade financing across the industry.” Many are hopeful that a collaboration between ConsenSys, coupled with the aforementioned startup, will parent ground-breaking new innovations within the next few months and years. As alluded to in the document that broke this news, komgo has already eyed greatness, aiming to launch two products before this year’s end. The first will “standardize and facilitate” KYC processes without the utilization of a centralized database or system, while the second will purportedly be “digital letters of credit,” which will allow legacy platforms to submit digitized trade data to komgo and its bank partners. This news follows PWC Blockchain head Grainne Mcnamara’s comments regarding enterprise-level solutions, in which she noted that firms are finding it difficult to roll out such systems in a manner that is “at-scale” and is cheaper than traditional systems. But if komgo SA proves to be a success, as many hope, her fears about the barriers that blockchain solutions will need to cross will be respectfully cast aside. Featured Image From Shutterstock The post ING, Citigroup, Shell And ConsenSys Partner to Create Ethereum-Based Platforms appeared first on NewsBTC.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Disclaimer: Trading in bitcoins or other digital currencies carries a high level of risk and can result in the total loss of the invested capital. theonlinetech.org does not provide investment advice, but only reflects its own opinion. Please ensure that if you trade or invest in bitcoins or other digital currencies (for example, investing in cloud mining services) you fully understand the risks involved! Please also note that some external links are affiliate links.