Home / Crypto Currency / John McAfee Told His Followers to ‘Flood’ the SEC’s Inbox. It Didn’t Go Well.

John McAfee Told His Followers to ‘Flood’ the SEC’s Inbox. It Didn’t Go Well.


john mcafee BitFi

Advertisement

This is why we can’t have nice things.

A few months ago, cybersecurity pioneer and noted provocateur John McAfee took to Twitter to implore his followers to “flood” Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Jay Clayton’s office with emails and calls. McAfee wanted them to demand that Clayton — to whom he affectionately referred as “this mother f**ker” — square off against him in a public debate over whether initial coin offering (ICO) tokens should be classified as securities under federal law.

Now, thanks to documents obtained by Buzzfeed News through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, we know exactly how ugly a trainwreck it actually was. You can read all 100+ pages for yourself over at Buzzfeed, but we combed through this literary cornucopia so that you don’t have to.

You might want to sit down for this.

The Good

(This section left intentionally blank.)

The Bad

I knew I was in for trouble when one of the first submissions resurrected the hideous camelcase “BitCoin” in the service of the following word salad, which may or may not have been intended to be a poem.

Then there’s this email from a Yahoo Mail for iPhone user, who attempts to educate Clayton on the economics of an ICO called “Sand Coin,” which, the author claims, is not used for speculation — it’s used to buy (You guessed it!) Anakin Skywalker’s least-favorite naturally-occurring granular material from the project’s developers, and yes, it’s a real token.

This next author, similarly, sought to instruct Clayton on the regulatory status of one cryptocurrency in particular: XRP, which the SEC has conspicuously not referenced publicly as an example of a coin that is not a security.

Indeed, this strategy of persuasion-through-education was quite common. “Debate John mcafee about ico securities. They are not securities and he can educate you,” said a third email.

However, another of McAfee’s followers took a different tack, leveraging his or her position as a taxpayer (or the basement-dwelling progeny of a taxpayer, as the case may or may not be) to demand that Chairman Clayton, the author’s “employee” rule that ICOs are not securities. Failure to do so, the author warns, will “constitute insubordination…and be reflected in any upcoming reviews.”

This next one wasn’t particularly interesting, but I thought it was worth including simply due to the irony of writing in a FOIA-accessible document that publishing the contents of this message is “STRICTLY PROHIBITED.”

This one, though brief, was among the most coherent of the bunch.

And, of course, it wouldn’t be a real Twitter mob without a few insults thrown in for good measure. Here’s two: “Debate Mcafee you melt,” typed one iPhone user. “You seem to not be thinking logically about anything,” said another McAfee fan.

The Confused

Then there are the emails from Twitter users who clearly had no idea what was going on but didn’t want to miss out on the fun (#adorbs).

“Please debate with me mcafee,” read one.

Another of McAfee’s confused followers seemed to think that the hypothetical debate was related to the prolific ICO promoter’s recently-announced candidacy for president during the 2020 election.

“Greetings Sir, Please debate Mr John McAfee for US President come 2020. The man got my full support and I respect him so heartily. Thanks Sir and God bless you,” the email read.

Then there’s this one, which seems to begin with the assumption that Clayton has already won that aforementioned presidential election. That fact settled, the author proceeds to request that President Clayton provide formal guidance that “Bitcoin and Crypto money is securities,” which — to be clear — is the exact opposite of what McAfee is arguing. “We expect this from you,” the author concluded.

Reflections on an Afternoon (Well?) Spent

It’s difficult to accurately convey what I learned from the experience of reading through every one of the emails released by the SEC in the “McAfee File,” so I’ll just simply say that, assuming they were all written by native English speakers living the U.S., Hooked on Phonics might be primed for a commercial renaissance. After all, nine out of 10 parents say it works.

Granted, antics like this are always good for a hearty laugh, and for that, I suppose we can be thankful that McAfee always has a few up the sleeves of his ICO-sponsored shirt, nestled comfortably beside his “unhackable” wallet that has since dropped that claim.

However, it’s not all fun and “I’ll eat my manhood if the bitcoin price doesn’t reach $1 million in three years.” Just remember, the next time a bitcoin ETF ruling deadline approaches, the SEC has hundreds of emails like these sitting its archives, seemingly suggesting that a not-insignificant swath of cryptocurrency investors are incapable of forming a coherent sentence, much less evaluating the risks of trading a consumer-facing investment product like a bitcoin ETF.

Featured Image from YouTube

Follow us on Telegram or subscribe to our newsletter here.
Join CCN's crypto community for $9.99 per month, click here.
Want exclusive analysis and crypto insights from Hacked.com? Click here.
Open Positions at CCN: Full Time and Part Time Journalists Wanted.
Advertisement
Read more

Check Also

Bitcoin Cash Price Gets Skewed due to Exchange Trickery

A lot of confusing action is taking place where the Bitcoin Cash price is concerned. Although its actual decline in value is quite obvious for everyone to see, the real price of BCH is not necessarily what people can see on Coinmarketcap. This is primarily because numerous exchanges treat BCHABC as Bitcoin Cash already despite nothing being decided in terms of which chain will be the longest. Bitcoin Cash Value Fluctuates Heavily Depending on where traders look at, the price of Bitcoin Cash will be either close to the $400 level or down to $250-ish. That is quite a large gap between prices, yet one that is also very easy to explain. Bitcoin Cash, as people knew it before the fork, no longer exists. Most professional exchanges have also retired this price ticker, for the time being. As the hash war rages on, there are still a lot of unknown factors waiting to be addressed. Despite this ongoing kerfuffle, there is a net 5.76% decrease in the Bitcoin Cash price, and a 5.4% decline over Bitcoin. More specifically, that is what CoinMarketCap reports at this time, although this is not necessarily the case whatsoever. In fact, some exchanges are clearly jumping the gun by labeling BCHABC as BCH and thus dragging the Bitcoin Cash price down a bit more. Exchanges currently engaging in this activity include Bittrex and Coinex, neither of which plays a big role of importance when it comes to trading. However, based on the current value of BCH on Bitfinex and Gate.io, it seems a similar incident is taking place. One also has to keep in mind Bitcoin Cash was getting battered ahead of the network split as well. Most exchanges have halted trading of BCH indefinitely, primarily because the currency no longer exists. It is evident either BCHABC or BCHSV will take over that name in the future, but nothing has been decided at this point. As such, any trading referring to just “Bitcoin Cash” or “BCH” should be avoided, as most users can never be sure which currency is effectively being traded under this name. All of this skews the picture pertaining to Bitcoin Cash altogether. Coinmarketcap reports there is still $392m in trading volume for BCH, even though that is virtually impossible right now. With so many exchanges freezing deposits and withdrawals, it is evident actual BCH trading is no longer possible whatsoever. Virtually all platforms have deposits of BCHSV and BCHABC frozen as well, which only makes this market trend more confusing. It is safe to say the entire network split has been a bit of a mess first and foremost. In the case of Bitcoin Cash itself, that name will – under the current circumstances- not be used across exchanges for much longer. Instead, the two separate camps need to be treated as such first and foremost. Until things settle down – with might not necessarily happen anytime soon – the Bitcoin Cash price itself is pretty much irrelevant for most traders and speculators. Disclaimer: This is not trading or investment advice. The above article is for entertainment and education purposes only. Please do your own research before purchasing or investing into any cryptocurrency. The post Bitcoin Cash Price Gets Skewed due to Exchange Trickery appeared first on NullTX.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Disclaimer: Trading in bitcoins or other digital currencies carries a high level of risk and can result in the total loss of the invested capital. theonlinetech.org does not provide investment advice, but only reflects its own opinion. Please ensure that if you trade or invest in bitcoins or other digital currencies (for example, investing in cloud mining services) you fully understand the risks involved! Please also note that some external links are affiliate links.