Home / Crypto Currency / Bitcoin Price Intraday Analysis: BTC/USD in Bear Flagpole Formation

Bitcoin Price Intraday Analysis: BTC/USD in Bear Flagpole Formation

Bitcoin price


Bitcoin on Tuesday depreciated more than 3 percent against the US Dollar after reversing from a bear flag top yesterday.

The BTC/USD walked the day carrying the prevailing bearish sentiment on its shoulders. The early Asian trading session opened at 6518-fiat and didn’t wait much before dropping below key support areas around 6500-fiat and 6400-fiat. By the end of the mid-Asian session and the beginning of early European trading hours, BTC/USD had established its intraday low towards 6370-fiat. At the time of the press, the pair is consolidating sideways in near-term, showing minimum bounce back sentiment. Ideally, the price is forming a bear flagpole.

BTC/USD Technical Indicators

We had expected a reversal to initiate a run towards the medium-term range support near 6118-fiat. There is a crucial support zone midway near 6400-fiat as we approach the said range parameter. If BTC/USD doesn’t hold through the interim buying sentiment area, then we could be looking at a short position riot towards 6118-fiat. Fortunately, the area between 6118-fiat and 5785-fiat is also our whale accumulating channel, what we believe could create some potential long opportunities towards the descending trendline. This trendline has been there for almost 9-months, and it is one of the main reasons why we are so bearish in the medium-run.

Indeed, a breakdown scenario, in which the price breaks below the bottom area between 5785-fiat and 5850-fiat, could invoke a free fall towards 4500-fiat. Similarly, a breakout above the falling trendline could mean an extended bull run towards 8348-fiat, the neckline of the inverse head & shoulder, incomplete for now.

The RSI and Stochastic indicate an extended selling action. The RSI is particularly looking to repeat its pullback from the overbought area towards the 30-40 range.

BTC/USD Intraday Analysis

Our intraday strategy is influencing us to keep our positions intrarange between the symmetrical triangle formation. So far, we have squeezed a small profit out of our long position from 6370-fiat to 6450-fiat, and a reversal from the upper trendline is keeping us short towards lower trendline while eyeing 6370-fiat as interim support. A stop loss on short is necessary so we are putting it just two-pips above the upper trendline.

A break below 6370-fiat will be an altogether different scenario to play out. The extent of a bearish action at this point could be huge. So, near-term short positions will yield results anyhow. We will avoid playing a breakdown strategy merely because of its minimal profitability and high risk (in case one becomes too bearish towards the medium-term support near 6118-fiat). Instead, we’ll be waiting for a large green candle to allow us to put a long position on a bounce back, towards the nearest upside target. If a bounce back takes place from 6370-fiat, we’ll go long towards the upper trendline of the symmetric triangle, while keeping our stop loss 3-pips below the entry point.

Trade safely CCNers!

Featured image from Shutterstock. Charts from TradingView.

Follow us on Telegram or subscribe to our newsletter here.
Join CCN's crypto community for $9.99 per month, click here.
Want exclusive analysis and crypto insights from Hacked.com? Click here.
Open Positions at CCN: Full Time and Part Time Journalists Wanted.
Read more

Check Also

Real Reason Why China Doesn’t Want Blockchain: Strict Censorship

The Cyberspace Administration of China is tightening its stance against anonymity offered under the garb of blockchain technology. The central internet regulator, notorious for its role in building the so-called “The Great Firewall of China,” has drafted new regulations that would require local blockchain companies to register users with their real names and national identification card numbers. The proposal surfaced in the wake of a two decades old sexual assault case at a top Chinese university, which the authorities hid from the public eye for years. An activist published an open letter on social media, including WeChat and Weibo, to provide details about the case to the public. The news attracted censorship, after which an anonymous poster published the same letter on Ethereum blockchain, a decentralized public ledger away from the Chinese jurisdiction. As a result, almost everybody in the world can now read the letter. Immutable Ledgers are Illegal The efforts of the authorities have the letter removed from the Ethereum blockchain could have led them to an understanding that they could not control it. Any information becomes immutable as soon as it gets recorded on a public ledger. The entire foundation of a decentralized ledger system conflicts with how the Chinese government prefer to control information. Their laws seek mutability – allowing authorities to chop or to add data that suits the state’s agenda – which public blockchains cannot offer. At the same time, China is flourishing with startups offering services at the top of blockchains, owing to more than 200 blockchain patents and a multi-billion dollar worth of investments that are already in line. Anonymity seems to be the only challenge that could keep regulators worried about blockchain’s mass adoption in the country. They have already enforced rules which require people to make registration with real-names on social media and online forums. But for what it may look like, the same rules cannot be applied on the immutable blockchains. ISO/TC 307 China until now had not developed a robust framework on cryptocurrencies and blockchain. With their new stance against anonymity offered by public chains, the authorities are likely to run into a conflict with its members at the International Organization for Standardization. The ISO/TC 307 Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies commission, which conceptualized and is now running a global blockchain standard program with 39 participating and 13 observing countries, should find it difficult to come with an enterprise and public-interest framework when one of its PARTICIPATING members are against one of the core blockchain applications. The democratic countries in the 39-member list have shown seriousness towards data privacy in the past. And it is likely that their version of blockchain would appear different from what China has in mind – a censorship-enabled ledger commonly known as a private database. The anti-blockchain anonymity law has not come into effect, yet, but its likelihood of being imposed is vast considering China’s negative attitude towards anonymity – especially financial privacy – so far. The international standards for the blockchain industry, meanwhile, expects to be drafted by the end of 2019. The post Real Reason Why China Doesn’t Want Blockchain: Strict Censorship appeared first on NewsBTC.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Disclaimer: Trading in bitcoins or other digital currencies carries a high level of risk and can result in the total loss of the invested capital. theonlinetech.org does not provide investment advice, but only reflects its own opinion. Please ensure that if you trade or invest in bitcoins or other digital currencies (for example, investing in cloud mining services) you fully understand the risks involved! Please also note that some external links are affiliate links.