Home / Crypto Currency / Lawyer: 5,000 Allegedly Stolen Bitcoins Belonged to ‘Mr. X’ — Not Winklevoss Twins

Lawyer: 5,000 Allegedly Stolen Bitcoins Belonged to ‘Mr. X’ — Not Winklevoss Twins

Gemini winklevoss bitcoin


A lawyer for early bitcoin adopter Charlie Shrem is biting back at claims that his client stole 5,000 bitcoins from Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, founders of crypto exchange Gemini and the “first bitcoin billionaires.”

In a filing dated Nov. 5, lawyer Brian Klein claims that the 5,000 BTC in question, which the Winklevoss twins allege Shrem siphoned off from funds he had purchased on their behalf in 2012, belong to another prominent investor referred to as “Mr. X” and that the suit is “nonsense.”

“Shrem engaged in no wrongdoing. Period,” Klein argued, adding later that, “This…lawsuit can only be characterized as an ambush money-grab designed to cripple Shrem financially.”

As CCN reported, the Winklevoss twins, via Winklevoss Capital Fund, had given Shrem — the founder of defunct bitcoin exchange BitInstant as well as the Bitcoin Foundation — $250,000 to help them invest in bitcoin. They allege that $61,000 worth of those funds were never accounted for and that Shrem used the missing capital to purchase 5,000 BTC for himself, coins that are now worth more than $32 million.

charlie shrem bitcoin
Charlie Shrem | Source: Byte Federal/YouTube

As evidence, they pointed to his lavish lifestyle, which would not seem to mesh with his claim that he had virtually no money when he went to prison in 2015 after pleading guilty to knowingly selling cryptocurrency to people who said they intended to use the funds to purchase drugs on infamous dark web marketplace Silk Road. He spent more than a year in prison, in addition to agreeing to pay the government nearly $1 million in restitution.

“Either Shrem has been incredibly lucky and successful since leaving prison, or — more likely — he ‘acquired’ his six properties, two Maseratis, two powerboats and other holdings with the appreciated value of the 5,000 Bitcoin he stole,” a portion of the suit reads.

With the help of a private investigator, the Winklevoss twins identified a bitcoin wallet that received 5,000 BTC from an address associated with Shrem around the same time that their funds went missing. The bulk of these coins eventually ended up at Xapo and Coinbase, and the twins allege that Shrem has been using them to fund millions of dollars in real estate purchases, as well as other luxury expenses including sports cars and speedboats.

charlie shrem bitcoin
Source: Blockchain.com

In Monday’s filing, however, Klein claims that these funds belong to Mr. X, who in Dec. 2012 asked Shrem for help moving his coins into cold storage. Mr. X sent the funds to Shrem’s bitcoin address and then met him at BitInstant, where Shrem helped him set up a cold storage wallet for the BTC.

“Nor can WCF prove Shrem engaged in any misconduct. He did not. Shrem can show by verifiable evidence that he did not take the 5,000 bitcoins WCF accuses him of taking, and that they belonged to Mr. X. Shrem therefore did not breach any duty to WCF, even if one were found to exist.”

“WCF’s case collapses on itself because those 5,000 bitcoins were not owned by Shrem,” Klein added. “The scandalous and fantastical story WCF is advancing is nonsense.”

The filing further addressed the suggestion in the suit that Shrem was derelict in his obligation to pay the US government $950,000 he owed as a result of his plea deal, stating that Shrem had already, prior to learning of the suit, begun paying off this debt.

According to another document located by Ars Technica, the two sides will meet in court Nov. 8. Previously, Shrem had agreed to cap his spending at $50,000 per month and refrain from making any cryptocurrency transfers, restrictions which will be reevaluated after the hearing.

Read the full filing below:

Shrem Filing Nov. 5 by CCN on Scribd

Featured Image from Shutterstock

Follow us on Telegram or subscribe to our newsletter here.
Read more

Check Also

Bitcoin Cash Price Gets Skewed due to Exchange Trickery

A lot of confusing action is taking place where the Bitcoin Cash price is concerned. Although its actual decline in value is quite obvious for everyone to see, the real price of BCH is not necessarily what people can see on Coinmarketcap. This is primarily because numerous exchanges treat BCHABC as Bitcoin Cash already despite nothing being decided in terms of which chain will be the longest. Bitcoin Cash Value Fluctuates Heavily Depending on where traders look at, the price of Bitcoin Cash will be either close to the $400 level or down to $250-ish. That is quite a large gap between prices, yet one that is also very easy to explain. Bitcoin Cash, as people knew it before the fork, no longer exists. Most professional exchanges have also retired this price ticker, for the time being. As the hash war rages on, there are still a lot of unknown factors waiting to be addressed. Despite this ongoing kerfuffle, there is a net 5.76% decrease in the Bitcoin Cash price, and a 5.4% decline over Bitcoin. More specifically, that is what CoinMarketCap reports at this time, although this is not necessarily the case whatsoever. In fact, some exchanges are clearly jumping the gun by labeling BCHABC as BCH and thus dragging the Bitcoin Cash price down a bit more. Exchanges currently engaging in this activity include Bittrex and Coinex, neither of which plays a big role of importance when it comes to trading. However, based on the current value of BCH on Bitfinex and Gate.io, it seems a similar incident is taking place. One also has to keep in mind Bitcoin Cash was getting battered ahead of the network split as well. Most exchanges have halted trading of BCH indefinitely, primarily because the currency no longer exists. It is evident either BCHABC or BCHSV will take over that name in the future, but nothing has been decided at this point. As such, any trading referring to just “Bitcoin Cash” or “BCH” should be avoided, as most users can never be sure which currency is effectively being traded under this name. All of this skews the picture pertaining to Bitcoin Cash altogether. Coinmarketcap reports there is still $392m in trading volume for BCH, even though that is virtually impossible right now. With so many exchanges freezing deposits and withdrawals, it is evident actual BCH trading is no longer possible whatsoever. Virtually all platforms have deposits of BCHSV and BCHABC frozen as well, which only makes this market trend more confusing. It is safe to say the entire network split has been a bit of a mess first and foremost. In the case of Bitcoin Cash itself, that name will – under the current circumstances- not be used across exchanges for much longer. Instead, the two separate camps need to be treated as such first and foremost. Until things settle down – with might not necessarily happen anytime soon – the Bitcoin Cash price itself is pretty much irrelevant for most traders and speculators. Disclaimer: This is not trading or investment advice. The above article is for entertainment and education purposes only. Please do your own research before purchasing or investing into any cryptocurrency. The post Bitcoin Cash Price Gets Skewed due to Exchange Trickery appeared first on NullTX.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Disclaimer: Trading in bitcoins or other digital currencies carries a high level of risk and can result in the total loss of the invested capital. theonlinetech.org does not provide investment advice, but only reflects its own opinion. Please ensure that if you trade or invest in bitcoins or other digital currencies (for example, investing in cloud mining services) you fully understand the risks involved! Please also note that some external links are affiliate links.